The 2001 Teams Review
By Ewan Tytler, USA
Atlas F1 Magazine Writer
While the battle for the 2001 Constructors' Championship title was virtually sealed at the start of the season, the ten other teams still had to fight to the bitter end. Some won, some lost; progress is always relative. Ewan Tyler evaluates just how close the teams came to achieving the goals they set for themselves at the beginning of the season and the progress they made during the season
But improvements in tyre technology counteracted these aerodynamic changes on some circuits, and for the first time since the introduction of grooved tyres in 1998, new qualifying and race lap records were set at almost every circuit. The FIA also allowed the traction and launch-control systems to be reintroduced mid-season, at the Spanish Grand Prix. Many teams adapted well to these changes, while others found themselves stranded on the dummy grid or the starting grid.
The 2001 season included a competition between tyre manufacturers. Bridgestone scored 13 victories, 13 pole positions and 9 fastest race laps, while Michelin made significant progress, scoring 4 victories, 4 pole positions and 8 fastest race laps in their first season back in Formula One.
Chassis: Ferrari F2001. Engine: Ferrari 050. Tyres: Bridgestone.
Chassis: McLaren MP4/16. Engine: Ilmor-Mercedes-Benz FO110K V10. Tyres: Bridgestone.
McLaren's goals for the 2001 season were to regain the World Drivers' title and the Constructors' Cup. At the start of the season, team principal Ron Dennis stated: "Our motivation is there, if anything it is deeper than ever and we will be going a lot greyer." Dennis added: "Every year you have to dig deep because it gets tougher year by year. The regulation changes this year gives us more work but we know we are going in the right direction. We are looking forward not backwards and we are ready for the challenge." Needless to say, the year has not panned out the way Dennis wished.
The MP4-16 was a totally new car for the new regulations. Its launch was late, winter testing was limited and the car was not fully developed for the first three fly-away rounds of the Championship. The car initially suffered from understeer but worse still, McLaren stumbled when traction and launch control were introduced, as their TAG traction and launch control systems were overly complicated and not fully tested. The Ilmor-Mercedes-Benz FO110K V10 engine was not as powerful as the Ferrari and BMW engines. Reliability was also a serious problem, with all of their retirements due to car failures.
McLaren's race strategies were quite good, once they discovered that the MP4/16 was fastest when it was run for long first stints with late pitstops. This allowed the team to compensate somewhat for deficiencies during qualifying. At Suzuka, Mercedes-Benz Motorsport's Norbert Haug concluded: "A nice end to a tough season. Runner-up position in the Constructors' World Championship and David Coulthard's second place in the Drivers' Championship provide good motivation for going one better in 2002."
Chassis: Williams FW23/FW23B. Engine: BMW. Tyres: Michelin.
Nevertheless, Williams didn't have to wait for Ferrari or McLaren to make mistakes, and they could easily have finished 2nd in the Constructors' Championship. They built a stable design team since Adrian Newey's departure in 1997, and the four wins in the 2001 season were a significant landmark for this team. BMW-Williams set the most fastest race laps of the season and had more laps in the lead than McLaren-Mercedes. Reliability was their Achilles' Heel, with 10 of their DNFs due to mechanical failure. BMW Motorsport Director Gerhard Berger concluded: "All in all, it has been a great season with an encouraging finish."
Chassis: Sauber C20. Engine: Petronas 01A (Ferrari 049). Tyres: Bridgestone.
Peter Sauber rolled the dice by hiring two young, inexperienced drivers with great potential. Furthermore, chief designer Sergio Rinland and his assistant Steven Taylor both resigned from the team in rapid succession. To have achieved what turned out to be their best season under such conditions must be one of the biggest coups in recent F1 history. The Sergio Rinland-designed Sauber C20 was a very well balanced and competitive chassis. Coupled with the reliable Ferrari 049 V10 engine, this emerged as a very competitive package in the hands of Nick Heidfeld and Kimi Raikkonen.
Chassis: Jordan EJ11. Engine: Honda RA001E. Tyres: Bridgestone.
The strategy of patience, steady progress and "people-smartness" that the Jordan team had used to produced a stable, reliable and consistent team was abandoned as the team tried to regroup after a disappointing 2000 season and the loss of their technical director, Mike Gascoyne. Heinz-Harald Frentzen was unceremoniously dumped from the team; veteran Jean Alesi was recruited to drive for the last quarter of the season; test driver Ricardo Zonta was thrown in for two races at very short notice. Stability was not the keyword at the Jordan camp this year.
The Honda RA001E was underpowered, but the EJ11 was a respectable chassis that was competitive during qualifying but was not as effective under race trim and never had a podium finish. Jordan struggled after the introduction of traction and launch control, and their launch control system failed on several occasions.
Chassis: BAR 003. Engine: Honda RA001E. Tyres: Bridgestone.
It seems that once again BAR were bullish in their expectations at the start of the season: the Honda RA001E engine was underpowered, and the BAR 003 chassis was not competitive. And in fact, BAR just managed to beat Jordan into 5th slot by virtue of Jacques Villeneuve's podium finishes in Spain and Germany.
Chassis: Benetton B201. Engine: Renault. Tyres: Michelin.
Renault, on its way to finalising its takeover of Benetton, had gambled on a radical 111° V10 engine this year. It was, in the short run, a bad gamble as the car was simply slow. However, in the long run that gamble may well pay off, if they in fact manage to develop a next-generation engine. Briatore explained: "We decided in the end to start with a new engine. Sure it was much more sensible with the old one, but if you start with the old one you never develop properly the new one. If you want to take the risk, like I tell you before, new engine and new tyres, then it's exactly the year we need to do this."
Either way, Benetton's last year in Formula One started badly. The B201 has been neither fast nor reliable and was barely able to compete with Minardis in the opening rounds. However, developments by Renault throughout the season resulted in significant steps forward. The team had a relatively competitive package for the latter half of the season, the Renault engine was actually quite reliable, and their launch-control system was very effective.
Chassis: Jaguar R2. Engine: Cosworth CR3. Tyres: Michelin.
Ford's financial muscle should have give Jaguar the resources to introduce new developments quickly. But instead, Jaguar were in disarray, the chaos spilling over from 2000 into 2001. Neil Ressler, the vice-president and chief technology officer of Ford, had hired Rahal as Team Principal in 2000. Rahal continued his head-hunting project and tried unsuccessfully to recruit McLaren's Adrian Newey. Ressler retired in the beginning of 2001 and Niki Lauda was appointed as chief executive of Ford's Premier Performance Division. Rahal was ousted despite making significant progress by mid-season. Added to that, the team had a driver change mid-season, replacing Luciano Burti with Pedro de la Rosa. Again, stability was an uncommon concept in the Jaguar garage.
The Jaguar R2 was not competitive in winter testing and was inconsistent in performance. In the last half of the season, some perfomances showed promise. At season's end, Lauda stated: "It was not a great way to end what has been a succession of good performances, we have finished this season eighth in the Constructors' Championship and we'll now focus everything we have into next year's challenger. There is clearly a lot of work ahead of us."
Chassis: Prost AP04. Engine: Acer (Ferrari 049). Tyres: Michelin.
However, at the 2001 season's end, Prost again faces financial crisis. Managing Director Joan Villadelprat stated: "We are really glad that the year is over now, as it has been a very difficult season for everybody in the team. Everyone has done a very good job, especially all the people back in the factory. Needless to say, we are now looking forward to next season." The question remains, if they make it to next year's grid.
Prost was arguably the least stable team this year, with no less than 5 different drivers during the 2001 season. Nonetheless, some progress was made, as the team moved up from 11th and pointless in 2000, to 9th in this year's standings.
Chassis: Arrows A22. Engine: Asiatech. Tyres: Bridgestone.
At season's end Graham Taylor, Chief Race Engineer, stated: "Performance-wise we're not happy with the season, compared to 2000. We were strong in the races up to mid-season but have fallen behind, which was shown most vividly here in Suzuka. The plan now is to put this year behind us and crack on with our preparations for next season."
Chassis: Minardi PS1. Engine: European (Cosworth). Tyres: Michelin.
The new team principal, Paul Stoddart, revealed at the start of the season: "We have a five-year plan that is set in stone. In year one we want to summarise, stabilise, and rebuild, and in the next we will get an engine partner and climb up the field. In years three and four we will be in midfield, and hopefully get a works engine deal, and in year five we want to be regularly qualifying and finishing in the top 10." Stoddart most certainly achieved the goals for year one.
Stoddart appeared as a 'white knight' at the start of the season, feeding $50 million dollars into the struggling team. It was a miracle that the team produced two complete, running chassis for the season-opening Australian Grand Prix. A spare car was a luxury that they had to wait for. The PS1 arrived at Melbourne with no winter testing. Once again, limited funding and resources and the outdated and unreliable Cosworth engine limited progress. The season's best finish was a 9th at Montreal. Furthermore, at the Austrian Grand Prix, Technical Director, Gustav Brunner abruptly departed for Toyota and Gabriele Tredozi assumed his duties.
By the season's end, Stoddart commented: "Our reliability the whole weekend on such a demanding circuit [Suzuka] is an indication the team means to carry on in 2002 as it has finished the 2001 season, with significantly improved reliability and consistently higher grid positions. My heartfelt thanks go out to the whole team for a relentless effort this season, sometimes under highly trying circumstances. This has been a 'building' year for European Minardi, and having achieved our first-year goals, it's now onwards and upwards to 2002. Roll on Melbourne!"
© 2007 autosport.com
. This service is provided under the Atlas F1 terms and conditions.
Please Contact Us for permission to republish this or any other material from Atlas F1. |
|