The Bookworm Critique
By Mark Glendenning, Australia
Atlas F1 Columnist THE SCIENCE OF SAFETY
'The Science of Safety' is a sister volume to 'The Science of Speed' by the same author, and those who have read the latter should have a fairly good idea of what to expect. Essentially, Tremayne traces the history of the efforts that have been directed toward trying to make motorsport safer for both the participants and those who watch from close quarters. While he does explore the different safety measures that have been implemented over time, the book is as much an examination of the changes in the approach to the basic concept of making racing less dangerous. (It might be more correct to say 'an examination of the emergence of a basic approach to making racing safer', considering that preventative action rarely went further than a gesture during the sport's formative years).
Tremayne's accessible writing style, coupled with the comprehensive account of the changes in approaches to minimizing the risks inherent in racing, are the two strongest aspects of 'The Science of Safety'. A great deal of work appears to have gone into the book, particularly where interviews are concerned. The author spoke to an array of people in the course of collecting material for this book – something which, as obvious as it might seen, is becoming increasingly uncommon in the swamp of Formula One titles that are unleashed each year.
Different arguments are lined up alongside one another to help the reader develop some idea of the multi-dimensional nature of many safety issues, with Tremayne choosing to sometimes let the protagonist's words stand alone, and other times weighing with his own thoughts. It's a nice mix, and contributes greatly toward making the book seem more like a discussion and less like a lecture. It helps, too, that Tremayne's interviewees – Jackie Stewart, Max Mosley, Sid Watkins, Louis Stanley and the like – are the types of characters that almost invariably have something interesting to say.
That said, the book does have its flaws. 'The Science of Speed' was let down a little by its layout and presentation, particularly where the proliferation of outdated, black-and-white photos were concerned. This is still a problem in 'The Science of Safety', though not quite to the same degree. The shots are up-to-date, and in colour where possible, but the actual reproduction often leaves something to be desired. Granted, the paper stock that has been used might not readily lend itself to glossy, high-resolution images, but I'd certainly have expected better than the grainy, high-contrast, early-1970s-cookbook sort of colour that plagues several of the photos. (As an aside, it also appears that one photo is incorrectly captioned – the page 25 shot of a Benetton driver in training is labeled as Alexander Wurz, but it looks to me like Giancarlo Fischella).
There's also some scope for the fundamental structure of the text to be tightened up. There's too much cross-referencing (i.e. 'see Chapter Five'), which can become disorientating. This sort of stuff could easily have been overcome fairly simply had a little more thought gone into the way the book was organised. Some accounts of major racing accidents suffer similar organisational problems – we're taken through the particulars of certain accidents on more than one occasion, which becomes a little repetitive after a while. I feel I should make it clear, though, that I'm only pointing out these shortcomings because it's my job to – the good things about this book far outweigh the bad.
Before the modern era of safety (which I guess began at Imola in 1994), drivers often had what outsiders might consider to be an amazingly pragmatic approach to the risks that they were taking. It's not surprising, then, that I had no difficulty finding passages in the book that would make for a suitable excerpt. The piece that I finally settled on concerns the mid-1960s debates that surrounded a piece of equipment whose presence is taken as much for granted today as, say, wings. The item in question? Seatbelts.
If you've made it this far through the review, I think you'll like the book. It's an engaging work that is accessible and yet substantial enough to give you at least few days worth of happy reading. Despite the enormous (and seemingly obvious) importance of safety issues in Grand Prix racing, there have been relatively few titles written about the subject, and fewer still that have covered it as well as this. 'The Science of Safety' is well worth a look.
© 2007 autosport.com
. This service is provided under the Atlas F1 terms and conditions.
Please Contact Us for permission to republish this or any other material from Atlas F1. |
|