ATLAS F1 Volume 6, Issue 34 | |
The Grapevine Rumours and speculation in the world of F1 |
by The F1 Rumors Team |
This week's Grapevine brings you
Playing the transfer market
Following the news of Jenson Button's "loan" to Benetton for two years, it seems that Formula One is setting itself up to again come in to conflict with the European Union - this time in the Court of Human Rights. Fans of European soccer will be aware that the bottom is expected to drop out of the transfer market in the next year or so, with a firm court ruling that contracts cannot be bought or sold, as they are currently. As it stands, players wishing to change employer (team) require the two parties to negotiate a selling price for their contracts, and they are dependant on the both clubs coming to terms before the transfer can happen. It can be a whole lot more complicated, with players "loaned" alongside stars, and other sweeteners to keep the deal amicable, but that is basically what it is about. Or at least, it used to be. Jean-Marc Bosman started a huge ball rolling, when he demanded the right to a free transfer at the end of his contract. The team he played for wanted his new club to pay them for the "transfer," as under the existing system, clubs effectively owned players even after a contract had expired. The EU ruled this unfair, and the whole situation is changing. In the USA, back in 1949, Olivia de Haviland was tied to a studio, and only offered roles in B-films. Objecting to being forced into mediocrity, she took her employer to court in an anti-trust case that changed the whole concept of studios "owning" stars... It is by no means a forgone conclusion that drivers contesting their contracts will be able to break them, however: the music industry has demonstrated their continued hold over long term signings of major stars - George Michael being the most public of recent cases. That said, between the States and Europe, Formula One is heading for murky waters, should any driver really wish to be freed from a restrictive contract.
Playing favourites: head games
The suggestion by Jean Todt that McLaren favour Mika Hakkinen over his team-mate, in stark contrast to the teams' own statements, was an astute move by the Ferrari strategist. Early in the season, Michael Schumacher appeared to discount David Coulthard as a title challenger. The situation remained, and clearly irked the Scot, until the French Grand Prix - when Schumacher's bullish viewpoint began to turn. Three non-finishes later, his acknowledgement that Coulthard and Hakkinen were equally able to wrest the crown this season came as no surprise. Equally to the point, the reason for McLaren's potential success was placed squarely on the advantages their machinery has over his Ferrari at this stage in the season. A lot of readers - particularly Schumacher fans - will immediately feel the need to write in and tell us that Schumacher's immense skill is the only factor in keeping Ferrari with the McLarens; but they need not do so this time: this article is not about the actual performance of the cars, or who is the best driver. It's about a very astute, professional team and driver, looking to maximising an advantage over an opponent... The comments, levelled at Mika Hakkinen, could have little or no effect. The Flying Finn has dragged a decent performance out of a fading Lotus, out-qualified Senna in the same machinery, and out-Schumachered Schumacher head-to-head. No-one apart from Hakkinen himself can shake his confidence in himself, or his ability. David Coulthard, on the other hand, is a slightly different story. When he entered the sport alongside Damon Hill in 1994, Coulthard knew he had lucked into arguably the best seat in the field. Only Schumacher in a Benetton had the pace on Williams that year, and Coulthard worked hard to get up with the championships main protagonists. He did well that year, though slightly less well the year after, before leaving for a seat at McLaren. Through-out his time at Williams, pressure from particularly the British press held him to be a reasonable, if unremarkable driver, who lucked into the best car in the paddock. They implied the car, and not his skills, was the real factor... Moving on, a sparse couple of years at McLaren did little to further opinions in the paddock, before the dominant car of '98 was forthcoming. Coulthard's performance did not quite match that of Hakkinen in '98 or '99, resulting in many rumours of his pending dismissal for failing to perform... being kept on by Ron Dennis helped, and recent performances have demonstrated that the he has the capacity to do the job. At least, whilst he is focussed on the job at hand. Claiming the McLaren advantage is due to the car alone - whether or not it really is - and making accusations that the team favours Hakkinen are both unsettling. If there is a chink in Coulthards mental armour, then this is going to be the best way to prise it open. Or at least, that is what Ferrari hopes!
Silly Season Update
Picked from the Bunch
|
F1 Rumors | © 2000 Kaizar.Com, Incorporated. |
Send rumours and comments to: grapevine@atlasf1.com | Terms & Conditions |
"The Grapevine" is prepared exclusively for Atlas F1 by The F1 Rumors team | |